githubEdit

07. Max Sum in the Configuration

โœ… GFG solution to the Max Sum in the Configuration problem: find maximum value of sum of i*arr[i] among all rotations using mathematical optimization technique. ๐Ÿš€

The problem can be found at the following link: ๐Ÿ”— Question Linkarrow-up-right

๐Ÿงฉ Problem Description

Given an integer array arr[]. Find the maximum value of the sum of i*arr[i] for all 0 โ‰ค i โ‰ค arr.size()-1. The only operation allowed is to rotate (clockwise or counterclockwise) the array any number of times.

A rotation shifts all elements of the array by one position either to the left or right, with the element at the boundary wrapping around to the other end.

๐Ÿ“˜ Examples

Example 1

Input: arr[] = [3, 1, 2, 8]
Output: 29
Explanation: Out of all the possible configurations by rotating the elements: 
arr[] = [3, 1, 2, 8] here (3*0) + (1*1) + (2*2) + (8*3) = 29 is maximum.

Example 2

Input: arr[] = [1, 2, 3]
Output: 8
Explanation: Out of all the possible configurations by rotating the elements: 
arr[] = [1, 2, 3] here (1*0) + (2*1) + (3*2) = 8 is maximum.

Example 3

๐Ÿ”’ Constraints

  • $1 \le \text{arr.size()} \le 10^4$

  • $1 \le \text{arr}[i] \le 20$

โœ… My Approach

The optimal approach uses a Mathematical Formula to avoid simulating each rotation explicitly:

Mathematical Optimization Pattern

  1. Compute Initial Values:

    • Calculate the sum of all array elements: sum = ฮฃ arr[i]

    • Calculate initial weighted sum: val = ฮฃ (i * arr[i]) for the original configuration.

    • Initialize result res = val.

  2. Derive Rotation Formula:

    • When we rotate the array left by one position, the new weighted sum can be derived from the previous one.

    • Mathematical relation: next_val = current_val + sum - n * arr[n-i]

    • This formula eliminates the need to recalculate the entire sum for each rotation.

  3. Iterate Through Rotations:

    • For each rotation from i = 1 to n-1:

      • Apply the formula: val = val + sum - n * arr[n-i]

      • Update maximum: res = max(res, val)

  4. Return Result:

    • After checking all rotations, return the maximum value found.

๐Ÿ“ Time and Auxiliary Space Complexity

  • Expected Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the size of the array. We compute the initial sum and weighted sum in O(n), then iterate through n-1 rotations, each taking O(1) time to update using the mathematical formula.

  • Expected Auxiliary Space Complexity: O(1), as we only use a constant amount of additional space to store variables like sum, val, and res regardless of input size.

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป Code (C++)

chevron-rightโšก View Alternative Approaches with Code and Analysishashtag

๐Ÿ“Š 2๏ธโƒฃ Prefix Sum Optimization

๐Ÿ’ก Algorithm Steps:

  1. Precompute cumulative sum for efficient rotation calculations.

  2. Use mathematical formula to derive next rotation value.

  3. Apply transition formula: next = current + total_sum - n * last_element.

  4. Track maximum across all computed values.

๐Ÿ“ Complexity Analysis:

  • Time: โฑ๏ธ O(n) - Single pass with formula application

  • Auxiliary Space: ๐Ÿ’พ O(1) - Only variables stored

โœ… Why This Approach?

  • Uses standard library for cleaner code

  • Mathematical derivation of rotation formula

  • Efficient single-pass solution

๐Ÿ“Š 3๏ธโƒฃ Reverse Iteration Pattern

๐Ÿ’ก Algorithm Steps:

  1. Calculate initial sum and weighted sum in first pass.

  2. Iterate from end to beginning for rotation simulation.

  3. Update value using: new_val = old_val - (sum - last) + last * (n-1).

  4. Maximize result at each step.

๐Ÿ“ Complexity Analysis:

  • Time: โฑ๏ธ O(n) - Linear scan with constant updates

  • Auxiliary Space: ๐Ÿ’พ O(1) - In-place computation

โœ… Why This Approach?

  • Alternative iteration direction for variety

  • Compact variable naming for brevity

  • Same optimal complexity with different style

๐Ÿ†š ๐Ÿ” Comparison of Approaches

๐Ÿš€ Approach

โฑ๏ธ Time Complexity

๐Ÿ’พ Space Complexity

โœ… Pros

โš ๏ธ Cons

๐Ÿงฎ Mathematical Formula

๐ŸŸข O(n)

๐ŸŸข O(1)

๐Ÿš€ Optimal performance

๐Ÿง  Requires formula derivation

๐Ÿ“Š Prefix Sum

๐ŸŸข O(n)

๐ŸŸข O(1)

๐ŸŽฏ Clean STL usage

๐Ÿ“š Similar to main approach

โ†ฉ๏ธ Reverse Iteration

๐ŸŸข O(n)

๐ŸŸข O(1)

โœจ Compact code

๐Ÿ”ง Same logic, different direction

๐Ÿ† Best Choice Recommendation

๐ŸŽฏ Scenario

๐ŸŽ–๏ธ Recommended Approach

๐Ÿ”ฅ Performance Rating

๐Ÿ… Competitive Programming

๐Ÿฅ‡ Mathematical Formula

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

๐ŸŽฏ Production Code

๐Ÿฅˆ Prefix Sum

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

๐Ÿ’ก Interview Settings

๐Ÿฅ‰ Mathematical Formula

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

โ˜• Code (Java)

๐Ÿ Code (Python)

๐Ÿง  Contribution and Support

For discussions, questions, or doubts related to this solution, feel free to connect on LinkedIn: ๐Ÿ“ฌ Any Questions?arrow-up-right. Let's make this learning journey more collaborative!

โญ If you find this helpful, please give this repository a star! โญ


๐Ÿ“Visitor Count

Visitor counter

Last updated