18. LCM Triplet

βœ… GFG solution to the LCM Triplet problem: find maximum possible LCM by selecting three numbers ≀ n using mathematical optimization and greedy approach. πŸš€

The problem can be found at the following link: πŸ”— Question Link

🧩 Problem Description

Given a number n, find the maximum possible LCM that can be obtained by selecting three numbers less than or equal to n.

Note: LCM stands for Lowest Common Multiple.

The goal is to find three numbers ≀ n such that their LCM is maximized.

πŸ“˜ Examples

Example 1

Input: n = 9
Output: 504
Explanation: 504 is the maximum LCM that can be attained by any triplet of numbers less than or equal 9.
The triplet which has this LCM is {7, 8, 9}.

Example 2

Input: n = 7
Output: 210
Explanation: 210 is the maximum LCM that can be attained by any triplet of numbers less than or equal 7.
The triplet which has this LCM is {5, 6, 7}.

πŸ”’ Constraints

  • $1 \le n \le 10^3$

βœ… My Approach

The optimal approach uses Mathematical Optimization with Greedy Strategy to maximize LCM:

Mathematical Analysis + Greedy Selection

  1. Key Insight:

    • To maximize LCM, we need to choose numbers that are as large as possible and have minimal common factors.

    • The LCM of three numbers is maximized when they are pairwise coprime (gcd = 1).

  2. Case Analysis:

    • Case 1: n < 3 β†’ Return n (insufficient numbers for triplet)

    • Case 2: n is odd β†’ Choose {n, n-1, n-2} (consecutive numbers have small gcds)

    • Case 3: n is even and n % 3 β‰  0 β†’ Choose {n, n-1, n-3} (avoid n-2 which is even)

    • Case 4: n is even and n % 3 = 0 β†’ Choose {n-1, n-2, n-3} (avoid n which is divisible by 3)

  3. Mathematical Reasoning:

    • When n is odd: n and n-1 are coprime, n-1 and n-2 are coprime

    • When n is even: avoid consecutive even numbers to minimize common factors

    • When n % 3 = 0: avoid n to prevent factor of 3 from reducing LCM

  4. Optimization:

    • Use bitwise operations for faster even/odd checks

    • Minimize conditional branches with ternary operators

    • Perform constant-time calculations regardless of input size

πŸ“ Time and Auxiliary Space Complexity

  • Expected Time Complexity: O(1), as we perform a constant number of arithmetic operations and conditional checks regardless of the input value n.

  • Expected Auxiliary Space Complexity: O(1), as we only use a constant amount of additional space for storing intermediate calculations.

πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Code (C++)

⚑ View Alternative Approaches with Code and Analysis

πŸ“Š 2️⃣ Bit Manipulation Optimized

πŸ’‘ Algorithm Steps:

  1. Use bitwise operations for even/odd checks

  2. Minimize conditional branches

  3. Leverage ternary operators for compact code

  4. Eliminate redundant calculations

πŸ“ Complexity Analysis:

  • Time: ⏱️ O(1)

  • Auxiliary Space: πŸ’Ύ O(1)

βœ… Why This Approach?

  • Pre-computed decrements reduce operations

  • Bitwise AND faster than modulo for even check

  • Clear logical flow

πŸ“Š 3️⃣ Lookup Table Optimization

πŸ’‘ Algorithm Steps:

  1. Use function pointers for different cases

  2. Eliminate conditional checks during runtime

  3. Pre-determine calculation method

  4. Efficient for repeated calls

πŸ“ Complexity Analysis:

  • Time: ⏱️ O(1)

  • Auxiliary Space: πŸ’Ύ O(1)

βœ… Why This Approach?

  • Lambda functions for modularity

  • Clean separation of logic

  • Maintainable code structure

πŸ“Š **4️⃣ Explicit Conditional Approach **

πŸ’‘ Algorithm Steps:

  1. Use explicit if-else statements for clarity

  2. Calculate each case separately

  3. Optimize for readability over compactness

  4. Easy to debug and modify (Optional If Main Method Not understood)

πŸ“ Complexity Analysis:

  • Time: ⏱️ O(1)

  • Auxiliary Space: πŸ’Ύ O(1)

βœ… Why This Approach?

  • Maximum readability and maintainability

  • Easy to understand the logic flow

  • Simple to debug and extend

πŸ†š πŸ” Comparison of Approaches

πŸš€ Approach

⏱️ Time Complexity

πŸ’Ύ Space Complexity

βœ… Pros

⚠️ Cons

πŸ” Ternary Chain

🟒 O(1)

🟒 O(1)

πŸš€ Minimal code, fast execution

πŸ’Ύ Hard to read for complex logic

πŸ”Ί Bit Manipulation

🟒 O(1)

🟒 O(1)

πŸ”§ Optimized operations

πŸ’Ύ Requires bit manipulation knowledge

πŸ“Š Function Pointers

🟒 O(1)

🟒 O(1)

⚑ Modular and maintainable

πŸ”§ Lambda overhead

🎯 Explicit Conditional

🟒 O(1)

🟒 O(1)

πŸ“– Maximum readability

πŸ’Ύ More verbose code

πŸ† Best Choice Recommendation

🎯 Scenario

πŸŽ–οΈ Recommended Approach

πŸ”₯ Performance Rating

⚑ Competitive Programming

πŸ₯‡ Ternary Chain

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

πŸ“Š Production Code

πŸ₯ˆ Bit Manipulation

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†

πŸš€ Large Scale Systems

πŸ₯‰ Function Pointers

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†

πŸŽ“ Educational/Learning

πŸŽ–οΈ Explicit Conditional

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†β˜†

πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Code (Java)

🐍 Code (Python)

🧠 Contribution and Support

For discussions, questions, or doubts related to this solution, feel free to connect on LinkedIn: πŸ“¬ Any Questions?. Let's make this learning journey more collaborative!

⭐ If you find this helpful, please give this repository a star! ⭐


πŸ“Visitor Count

Visitor counter

Last updated